This is 2000 annual report of ITJIT-NET IPv6 activity.
This report was made by Takahiro Yugawa(yugawa@as4682.spin.ad.jp) on 2001/1/5.
Network name
ITJIT-NET
History
- before 2000
assigned pTLA address 3ffe:504:200::/48 from IRI and connected to IRI
via IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel. routing protocol was RIPng(KAME route6d)
- 2000/1
assignd sNLA1 from WIDE.
- address: 2001:200:200::/40
- connection: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel
- routing: BGP4+(zebra)
- 2000/1
Renumberd edge nodes(/64 network) to newly assigned sNLA1 address.
- 2000/1
assigned two external parties.
- ichiro.org:2001:200:202::/48, tunnel, BGP4+
- cyber-fleet:2001:200:203::/48, tunnel, BGP4+
- 2000/1
connected to IMASY via tunnel, no address assign, BGP4+ private peer.
- 2000/2
assigned one external party.
- TokyoNet.GR.JP:2001:200:204::/48, tunnel, RIPng
- 2000/9
connected to JENS IPv6 network. assignd 2001:228:c00::/48.
tunnel, BGP4+
- applications
- DNS: bind8 + KAME patch
- HTTP: apache + KAME patch
- FTP: wu-ftpd + KAME patch
ftp.itjit.ne.jp is available for anonymous ftp.
- SMTP: sendmail + KAME patch
- SSH: ssh + KAME patch
Network topology
WIDE JENS (upstreams)
| |
| |
+---+ +----+
| |
| |
ITJIT-NET-------IMASY (peer)
| | |
| | |
+-------------+ | +------------+
| | |
| | |
ichiro.org cyber-fleet TokyoNet.GR.JP (downstreams)
Routing Protocol
- for upstreams & peer, we use BGP4+.
- for downstreams, we use both BGP4+ and RIPng according to the user's
request.
- for IGP we use RIPng.
Address assingment
We currently assign /48 address window, because it is a WIDE rule.
- 2001:200:200::/48 ITJIT-NET internal use
- 2001:200:202::/48 ichiro.org
- 2001:200:203::/48 cyber-fleet
- 2001:200:204::/48 TokyoNet.GR.JP
Troubles
We have experienced some routing troubles. They are categorized as follows.
- bug issue of KAME or Zebra.
troubleshooted by reporting/quickhack/version up.
- configuration issue
troubleshooted by correcting configuration.